.thick rules
Historian Lorraine Daston examines man’s appetite for rules and concludes that ‘thin rules’ – strict, unambiguous regulations – rarely make it. This is in contrast to ‘thick rules’, which allow room for interpretation, require examples to understand them and allow exceptions.
Rules. We need them. They provide orientation and direction, if not ‘too thick’. Sometimes ‘thin’ is just useful and necessary, like traffic rules, for example. However, ‘too thin’ often limits people’s autonomy. But what is many times more important: do those, who impose the rules, also live the rules themselves? Would they also respect them conscientiously if they were among those who have to apply them? Take a critical look at yourself, alone or as part of a team. I can imagine a lot of thin rules collapsing.
Remember, asking questions fosters a culture of dialogue. So hold back a little, ask a little more and listen a little more. It pays big dividends.
Source: Lorraine Daston. ‘Rules. A Short History of What We Live By.’